Schumann Resonance

Schumann Resonance

The Schumann resonances (SR) are some spectrum peaks within the very low frequency (ELF) area of the Earth’s electromagnetic field spectrum. Schumann resonances are global electromagnetic resonances, generated and excited by lightning discharges within the cavity created through the Earth’s surface and also the ionosphere.

This global electromagnetic resonance phenomenon is known as after physicist Winfried Otto Schumann who predicted it in past statistics in 1952. Schumann resonances occur since the space between the top of Earth and also the conductive ionosphere functions like a closed waveguide. The limited dimensions of the world cause this waveguide to do something like a resonant cavity for electromagnetic waves within the ELF band. The cavity is of course excited by electric currents in lightning. Schumann resonances would be the principal background in negligence the electromagnetic spectrum from 3 Hz through 60 Hz, and appearance as distinct peaks at very low frequencies (ELF) around 7.83 Hz (fundamental), 14.3, 20.8, 27.3 and 33.8 Hz.

Within the normal mode descriptions of Schumann resonances, the essential mode is really a standing wave on your lawn-ionosphere cavity having a wave length comparable to the circumference of the world. This cheapest-frequency (and greatest-intensity) mode from the Schumann resonance occurs in a frequency of roughly 4.11 Hz, however this frequency can differ slightly from a number of factors, for example solar-caused perturbations towards the ionosphere, which compresses top of the wall from the closed cavity.[citation needed] The greater resonance modes are spaced at roughly 6.5 Hz times,[citation needed] a characteristic related to the atmosphere’s spherical geometry. The peaks exhibit a spectral width of roughly 20% due to the damping from the particular modes within the dissipative cavity. The eighth partial lies at roughly 60 Hz.[citation needed]

Observations of Schumann resonances happen to be accustomed to track global lightning activity. Because of the bond between lightning activity and also the Earth’s climate it’s been recommended they could also be used to watch global temperature variations and variations water vapor within the upper troposphere. It’s been speculated that extraterrestrial lightning (on other planets) can also be detected and studied by way of their Schumann resonance signatures. Schumann resonances happen to be accustomed to read the lower ionosphere on the planet and contains been recommended as one method to explore the low ionosphere on celestial physiques. Effects on Schumann resonances happen to be reported following geomagnetic and ionospheric disturbances. More lately, discrete Schumann resonance excitations happen to be associated with transient luminous occasions – sprites, ELVES, jets, along with other upper-atmospheric lightning.[citation needed] A brand new field of great interest using Schumann resonances relates to short-term earthquake conjecture.[citation needed] Curiosity about Schumann resonances was restored in 1993 when E. R. Johnson demonstrated a correlation between your resonance frequency and tropical air temperatures, suggesting the resonance could be employed to monitor climatic change. In applied geophysics, the resonances of Schumann are utilized within the prospection of offshore hydrocarbon deposits.

In 1893, George Francis FitzGerald noted the upper layers from the atmosphere should be fairly good conductors. Presuming the height of those layers is all about 100 km above ground, he believed that oscillations (within this situation the cheapest mode from the Schumann resonances) might have a time period of .1 second. Due to this contribution, it’s been recommended to relabel these resonances “Schumann-FitzGerald resonances”. However FitzGerald’s findings weren’t broadly referred to as these were only presented in a meeting from the British Association for that Growth of Science, adopted with a brief mention inside a column anyway.

Therefore, the first suggestion that the ionosphere existed, able to trapping electromagnetic waves, is related to Heaviside and Kennelly (1902). It required another two decades before Edward Appleton and Barnett in 1925 could prove experimentally the presence of the ionosphere.

Although probably the most important mathematical tools for coping with spherical waveguides were produced by G. N. Watson in 1918, it had been Winfried Otto Schumann who first studied the theoretical facets of the worldwide resonances of the world-ionosphere waveguide system, known today because the Schumann resonances. In 1952-1954 Schumann, along with H. L. Konig, tried to appraise the resonant frequencies. However, it wasn’t until measurements produced by Balser and Wagner in 1960-1963 that sufficient analysis techniques were open to extract the resonance information in the background noise. Since that time there’s been an growing curiosity about Schumann resonances in a multitude of fields.

Lightning discharges are regarded as the main natural supply of Schumann resonance excitation lightning channels become huge antennas that radiate electromagnetic energy at frequencies below about 100 kHz. These signals are extremely weak in particular distances in the lightning source, however the Earth-ionosphere waveguide behaves just like a resonator at ELF frequencies and amplifies the spectral signals from lightning in the resonance frequencies.

The actual Earth-ionosphere waveguide isn’t a perfect electromagnetic resonant cavity. Losses because of finite ionosphere electrical conductivity lower the propagation speed of electromagnetic signals within the cavity, producing a resonance frequency that’s less than could be expected in a perfect situation, and also the observed peaks are wide. Additionally, there are a variety of horizontal asymmetries – day-night improvement in the peak from the ionosphere, latitudinal alterations in our planet’s magnetic field, sudden ionospheric disturbances, polar cap absorption, variation on your lawn radius of ± 11 km from equator to geographic rods, etc. that leave other effects within the Schumann resonance power spectra.

Today Schumann resonances are recorded at many separate research stations all over the world. The sensors accustomed to measure Schumann resonances typically contain two horizontal magnetic inductive coils for calculating its northern border-south and east-west aspects of the magnetic field, along with a vertical electric dipole antenna for calculating the vertical element of the electrical field. An average passband from the instruments is 3-100 Hz. The Schumann resonance electric field amplitude (~300 microvolts per meter) is a lot smaller sized compared to static fair-weather electric field (~150 V/m) within the atmosphere. Similarly, the amplitude from the Schumann resonance magnetic field (~1 picotesla) is many orders of magnitude smaller sized compared to Earth’s magnetic field (~30-50 microteslas). Specialized receivers and antennas are necessary to identify and record Schumann resonances. The electrical component is generally measured having a ball antenna, recommended by Ogawa et al., in 1966, linked to a higher-impedance amplifier. The magnetic induction coils typically contain tens- to hundreds-of-a large number of turns of wire wound around a core of high magnetic permeability.

In the beginning of Schumann resonance studies, it had been known that they may be accustomed to monitor global lightning activity. At any time there are approximately 2000 thunderstorms around the world. Producing ~50 lightning occasions per second, these thunderstorms are directly from the background Schumann resonance signal.

Figuring out the spatial lightning distribution from Schumann resonance records is really a complex problem: to be able to estimate the lightning intensity from Schumann resonance records it’s important to account for the distance to lightning sources and also the wave propagation between your source and also the observer. A typical approach is to create a preliminary assumption around the spatial lightning distribution, in line with the known qualities of lightning climatology. An alternate approach is placing the receiver in the South or north Pole, which remain roughly equidistant in the primary storm centers throughout the day. One way not requiring preliminary assumptions around the lightning distribution is dependant on the decomposition from the average background Schumann resonance spectra, utilizing ratios between your average electric and magnetic spectra and between their straight line combination. This method assumes the cavity is spherically symmetric and for that reason doesn’t include known cavity asymmetries which are thought to modify the resonance and propagation qualities of electromagnetic waves within the system.

The very best documented and also the most debated options that come with the Schumann resonance phenomenon would be the diurnal variations from the background Schumann resonance power spectrum.

A characteristic Schumann resonance diurnal record reflects the qualities of both global lightning activity and also the condition of the world-ionosphere cavity between your source region and also the observer. The vertical electric field is in addition to the direction from the source in accordance with the observer, and it is therefore a stride of worldwide lightning. The diurnal behavior from the vertical electric field shows three distinct maxima, connected using the three “locations” of planetary lightning activity: one at 9 UT (Universal Time) from the daily peak of storm activity from Southeast Asia one at 14 UT from the peak of African lightning activity and something at 20 UT from the peak of South American lightning activity. Time and amplitude from the peaks vary all year round, associated with periodic alterations in lightning activity.

Generally, the African peak may be the most powerful, reflecting the main contribution from the African “chimney” to global lightning activity. The ranking of these two other peaks—Asian and American—is the topic of a energetic dispute among Schumann resonance scientists. Schumann resonance observations produced from Europe show a larger contribution from Asia than from South Usa, while observations produced from The United States indicate the dominant contribution originates from South Usa.

Johnson and Satori claim that to be able to obtain “correct” Asia-America chimney ranking, it’s important to get rid of the influence during the dayOrevening variations within the ionospheric conductivity (day-night asymmetry influence) in the Schumann resonance records. The “remedied” records presented within the work by Satori, et al. reveal that despite removing your day-night asymmetry influence from Schumann resonance records, the Asian contribution remains more than American.

Similar outcome was acquired by Pechony et al. who calculated Schumann resonance fields from satellite lightning data. It had been assumed the distribution of lightning within the satellite maps would be a good proxy for Schumann excitations sources, despite the fact that satellite observations predominantly measure in-cloud lightning as opposed to the cloud-to-ground lightning which are the main exciters from the resonances. Both simulations—those neglecting your day-night asymmetry, and individuals using this asymmetry into account—showed exactly the same Asia-America chimney ranking. However, some optical satellite and climatological lightning data suggest the South American storm center is more powerful compared to Asian center.

The reason behind the disparity among rankings of Asian and American chimneys in Schumann resonance records remains unclear, and it is the topic of further research.

In early literature the observed diurnal variations of Schumann resonance power were described through the variations within the source-receiver (lightning-observer) geometry. It had been figured that no particular systematic variations from the ionosphere (which can serve as top of the waveguide boundary) are necessary to explain these variations. Subsequent theoretical studies supported the first estimations from the small influence from the ionosphere day-night asymmetry (distinction between day-side and night-side ionosphere conductivity) around the observed variations in Schumann resonance field intensities.

The eye within the influence during the day-night asymmetry within the ionosphere conductivity on Schumann resonances acquired new strength within the 1990s, after publication of the work by Sentman and Fraser. Sentman and Fraser created a method to separate the worldwide and also the local contributions towards the observed field power variations using records acquired concurrently at two stations which were broadly separated in longitude. They construed the diurnal variations observed each and every station when it comes to a mix of a diurnally different global excitation modulated through the local ionosphere height. The work they do, which combined both observations and conservation arguments, convinced many scientists of the significance of the ionospheric day-night asymmetry and inspired numerous experimental studies. However, lately it had been proven that results acquired by Sentman and Fraser could be roughly simulated having a uniform model (without considering ionosphere day-night variation) and for that reason can’t be distinctively construed exclusively when it comes to ionosphere height variation.

Schumann resonance amplitude records show significant diurnal and periodic variations which generally coincide over time using the occasions during the day-night transition (the terminator). This time around-matching appears to aid the suggestion of the significant influence during the day-night ionosphere asymmetry on Schumann resonance amplitudes. You will find records showing almost clock-like precision from the diurnal amplitude changes. However, there are many days when Schumann resonance amplitudes don’t increase at sunrise or don’t decrease at sunset. You will find studies showing the general behavior of Schumann resonance amplitude records could be recreated from diurnal and periodic storm migration, without invoking ionospheric variations. Two recent independent theoretical research has proven the variations in Schumann resonance power associated with your day-night transition tend to be smaller sized than individuals connected using the peaks from the global lightning activity, and then the global lightning activity plays a far more natural part within the variation from the Schumann resonance power.

It’s generally acknowledged that source-observer effects would be the dominant supply of the observed diurnal variations, but there remains considerable debate concerning the degree that day-night signatures can be found within the data. Thing about this debate comes from the truth that the Schumann resonance parameters extractable from observations provide merely a limited quantity of details about the coupled lightning source-ionospheric system geometry. The issue of inverting observations to concurrently infer both lightning source function and ionospheric structure thus remains very underdetermined, resulting in the potential of non-unique interpretations.

Among the interesting problems in Schumann resonances studies is figuring out the lightning source characteristics (the “inverse problem”). Temporally resolving every individual flash doesn’t seem possible since the mean rate of excitation by lightning, ~50 lightning occasions per second globally, mixes in the individual contributions together. However, from time to time very large lightning flashes occur which produce distinctive signatures that stick out in the background signals. Known as “Q-bursts”, they’re created by intense lightning strikes that transfer considerable amounts of charge from clouds down and frequently carry high peak current. Q-bursts can exceed the amplitude from the background signal level with a factor of 10 or even more and appearance with times of ~10 s, which enables to think about them as isolated occasions and see the origin lightning location. The origin location is decided with either multi-station or single-station techniques and needs presuming one for that Earth-ionosphere cavity. The multi-station techniques tend to be more accurate, but want more complicated and costly facilities.

It’s now believed that lots of the Schumann resonances transients (Q bursts) are based on the transient luminous occasions (TLEs). In 1995, Boccippio et al. demonstrated that sprites, the most typical TLE, are created by positive cloud-to-ground lightning occurring within the stratiform region of the storm system, and therefore are supported by Q-burst within the Schumann resonances band. Recent observations demonstrate that occurrences of sprites and Q bursts are highly correlated and Schumann resonances data may possibly be employed to estimate the worldwide occurrence rate of sprites.Johnson recommended that global temperature might be monitored using the Schumann resonances. The hyperlink between Schumann resonance and temperatures are lightning flash rate, which increases nonlinearly with temperature. The nonlinearity from the lightning-to-temperature relation supplies a natural amplifier from the temperature changes and makes Schumann resonance a sensitive “thermometer”. Furthermore, the ice particles which are thought to have fun playing the electrification processes which create a lightning discharge have a huge role within the radiative feedback effects that influence the climate temperature. Schumann resonances may therefore allow us to to know these feedback effects. A paper was printed in the year 2006 linking Schumann resonance to global surface temperature, that was adopted track of a 2009 study.

Tropospheric water vapor is really a key aspect of the Earth’s climate, that has direct effects like a green house gas, in addition to indirect effects through interaction with clouds, aerosols and tropospheric chemistry. Upper tropospheric water vapor (UTWV) includes a much greater effect on the green house effect than water vapor within the lower atmosphere, but whether this impact is really a positive or perhaps a negative feedback continues to be uncertain. The primary challenge in addressing this may be the difficulty in monitoring UTWV globally over lengthy timescales. Continental deep-convective thunderstorms produce the majority of the lightning discharges on the planet. Additionally, they transport great deal of water vapor in to the upper troposphere, dominating the variations of worldwide UTWV. Cost recommended that alterations in the UTWV could be produced from records of Schumann resonances.

The presence of Schumann-like resonances is conditioned mainly by two factors:

Inside the Solar System you will find five candidates for Schumann resonance recognition aside from the Earth: Venus, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and Saturn’s greatest moon Titan.

Modeling Schumann resonances around the planets and moons from the Solar Product is complicated by the possible lack of understanding from the waveguide parameters. No in situ capacity exists right now to validate the outcomes.

The most powerful evidence for lightning on Venus originates from the impulsive electromagnetic waves detected by Venera 11 and 12 landers. Theoretical calculations from the Schumann resonances at Venus were as reported by Nickolaenko and Rabinowicz and Pechony and Cost . Both studies produced very close results, indicating that Schumann resonances ought to be easily detectable with that planet given a lightning supply of excitation along with a suitably located sensor.

Within the situation of Mars there has been terrestrial observations of radio emission spectra which have been connected with Schumann resonances. The reported radio emissions aren’t from the primary electromagnetic Schumann modes, but instead of secondary modulations from the nonthermal microwave emissions in the planet at roughly the expected Schumann frequencies, and haven’t been individually confirmed to become connected with lightning activity on Mars. There’s the chance that future lander missions could carry in situ instrumentation to do the required measurements. Theoretical research is mainly forwarded to parameterizing the issue for future planetary explorers.

Recognition of lightning activity on Mars continues to be as reported by Ruf et al. . Evidence is indirect and by means of modulations from the nonthermal microwave spectrum at roughly the expected Schumann resonance frequencies. It is not individually confirmed these are connected with electrical discharges on Mars. In case confirmation is created by direct, in situ observations, it might verify the suggestion of the potential of charge separation and lightning strokes within the Martian dust storms produced by Eden and Vonnegut and Renno et al. . Martian global resonances were modeled by Sukhorukov , Pechony and Cost , and Molina-Cuberos et al. . The outcomes from the three research is somewhat different, however it appears that a minimum of the very first two Schumann resonance modes ought to be detectable. Proof of the very first three Schumann resonance modes exists within the spectra of radio emission in the lightning detected in Martian dust storms.

It had been lengthy ago recommended that lightning discharges can happen on Titan, but recent data from Cassini-Huygens appears to point that there’s no lightning activity about this largest satellite of Saturn. Because of the recent curiosity about Titan, connected using the Cassini-Huygens mission, its ionosphere is possibly probably the most completely modeled today. Schumann resonances on Titan have obtained more attention than you are on every other celestial body, in functions by Besser et al. , Morente et al. , Molina-Cuberos et al. , Nickolaenko et al. , and Pechony and Cost . It seems that just the very first Schumann resonance mode may be detectable on Titan.

Because the landing from the Huygens probe on Titan’s surface in The month of january 2005, there has been many reports on observations and theory of the atypical Schumann resonance on Titan. After several many fly-bys by Cassini, neither lightning nor thunderstorms were detected in Titan’s atmosphere. Scientists therefore suggested another supply of electrical excitation: induction of ionospheric currents by Saturn’s co-rotating magnetosphere. All data and theoretical models adhere to a Schumann resonance, the 2nd eigenmode which was observed through the Huygens probe. The most crucial consequence of this is actually the evidence of information on a hidden liquid water-ammonia sea within couple of many km from the icy subsurface crust.

Lightning activity continues to be optically detected on Jupiter. Information on lightning activity with that planet was predicted by Bar-Nun which is now based on data from Galileo, Voyagers 1 and a pair of, Pioneers 10 and 11, and Cassini. Saturn can also be confirmed to possess lightning activity. Though three visiting spacecraft (Pioneer 11 in 1979, Voyager one in 1980, and Voyager 2 almost 30 years ago) unsuccessful to supply any convincing evidence from optical observations, in This summer 2012 the Cassini spacecraft detected visible lightning flashes, and electromagnetic sensors aboard the spacecraft detected signatures which are sign of lightning. Little is famous concerning the electrical parameters from the interior of Jupiter or Saturn. The question of the items should function as the low waveguide boundary is really a non-trivial one out of situation from the gaseous planets. There appear to become no works focused on Schumann resonances on Saturn. Up to now there’s been just one make an effort to model Schumann resonances on Jupiter. Here, the electrical conductivity profile inside the gaseous atmosphere of Jupiter was calculated using methods much like individuals accustomed to model stellar interiors, also it was noticed that exactly the same methods might be easily extended to another gas giants Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Because of the intense lightning activity at Jupiter, the Schumann resonances ought to be easily detectable having a sensor suitably positioned inside the planetary-ionospheric cavity.